Six layers of assurance, from expert judgement to audit-ready evidence, for AI that has to stand up to scrutiny.
We grade your AI's outputs against the professional standard they have to meet, and hand you the evidence to prove it.
How it works →Expert evaluation
Credentialed professionals assess your AI's outputs against the standard their own field is held to.
Edge-case red-teaming
We surface the high-stakes cases where a plausible answer is the wrong one, before your users find them.
Audit-ready evidence
A clear record of what was tested, where it failed, and evidence that qualified professionals reviewed it.
Standards & rubrics
We define what “correct” means for your product: the rubric experts grade against, agreed with you upfront.
Regulatory alignment
Validation mapped to the regimes you answer to, the EU AI Act, FCA, UK GDPR and others.
Ongoing re-validation
As your model and the rules change, we re-check, so your evidence stays current and defensible.
Demos persuade. Evidence closes.
Automated testing tells you whether a model sounds right. It can't tell you whether it is right: whether the advice was suitable, the assessment sound, the answer compliant with rules the model was never taught.
In regulated work, those are the failures that cost deals, clients, and licences, and they're exactly the ones generic testing misses. Catching them takes someone who holds the professional standard your AI is trying to meet. That's who grades for us.
The AI we validate
If your product makes a call a professional would be accountable for, we can check it.
Talk to us →Advisory copilots →
Assistants that give finance, legal, or medical guidance to customers or professionals.
Document review →
Systems that read contracts, filings, or records and extract or judge what's in them.
Decision support →
Models that recommend, triage, or score, where a wrong call carries real consequence.
Diagnostic & clinical →
AI that interprets symptoms, images, or results to support a clinician's judgement.
Compliance & risk →
Tools that screen, flag, or assess against rules, policies, and regulation.
Research & summarisation →
Agents that gather, synthesise, and summarise complex regulated material.