In law, a confident wrong answer is a liability.
Contract review, legal research, drafting support. When your AI does work a qualified lawyer would be accountable for, we test it against the judgement of practising solicitors and barristers, and give you the evidence.
The legal AI we validate
Contract review & extraction
Systems that read agreements, extract obligations, and flag risk, where a missed clause is a missed liability.
Legal research & citation
Research assistants that cite authorities, where fabricated cases have already embarrassed real firms in real courtrooms.
Drafting assistance
Tools that draft clauses, letters, and documents, where plausible boilerplate can quietly change who carries the risk.
Litigation & disclosure review
AI that reviews, ranks, or summarises evidence and disclosure, where what it misses matters as much as what it finds.
Regulatory & compliance Q&A
Assistants answering questions about rules and obligations, where the answer has to be right in this jurisdiction, today.
Client intake & triage
Front-door tools that assess matters and route clients, where bad triage is bad advice with extra steps.
Validation is mapped to the professional standards legal work answers to, so your evidence supports conversations with firm risk committees, insurers, and the buyers who won't sign without proof.
- SRA standards: competence, integrity, and acting in the client's best interest
- Duties of confidentiality and legal professional privilege
- Accuracy of cited authorities: real cases, correctly applied
- Jurisdiction and currency: right law, right place, right version
- EU AI Act obligations for legal-decision support
- UK GDPR rules on automated processing of client data
Reviewed by lawyers who practise, not lawyers who used to.
Practising solicitors and barristers across commercial, property, employment, and disputes grade your AI's outputs the way they'd grade a trainee's work: against the standard their regulator holds them to.